Some history and details
on the Patrimony of the Primate
***
Although the ratification of the
Traditional Anglican Communion occurred
in Canada, the first meeting for the proposed
Traditional Anglican Communion was held
there in Orlando at what is today the
Cathedral of the Incarnation. That very
Church, where Bishop Campese served as
Ordinary for the last thirteen years,
was actually the first Church built from
the ground up in the Continuum. Furthermore,
in that same Church, at the ACA General
Synod in 1983, (then) Bishop Falk was
elevated to the office of the first Primate
of the Traditional Anglican Communion.
Archbishop Louis Falk graduated from
Nashotah House in 1962 and was ordained
in the Episcopal Church in that same year.
After leaving the active ministry for
a career in business, he joined the Anglican
Catholic Church in its early days, becoming
rector of St. Aidan’s Church in Des Moines
(where I now serve) and continued in that
capacity until the late 1980′s.
In 1981, he became the first bishop of
the Diocese of the Missouri Valley and
in 1983 became Archbishop and Primate
of the Anglican Catholic Church, leading
it into the merger that created the Anglican
Church in America later in 1991. He was
one of the key organizers of the Traditional
Anglican Communion and served as its primate
until 2002. It was only recently, in 2008,
that he retired as Ordinary of the Diocese
of the Missouri Valley but is still resident
here in Des Moines and is a cherished
part of St. Aidan’s parish.
When these two men were in Rome in
the early 1990′s, along with (then)
Father John Hepworth, they spoke with
the Secretary of the Pontifical Council
for the Promotion of Christian Unity.
They explained who they were and what
their intentions were. They were, at that
time, counseled by the Vatican to do certain
things to break down the barriers that
separated Anglicans from the Holy See,
and thereby lead to the full communion
they were seeking. First, they were told
to grow. The TAC has done exactly that
over the years, and though not all of
the Churches in the ACA are yet choosing
to follow through with accepting the offer
of Anglicanorum Coetibus, growth has occurred
(I have seen it firsthand). Many of those
in the TAC who are not yet ready, may
still decide later on to seek entrance
into the Ordinariates, and they will be
welcomed with open arms. Secondly, they
were counseled to get to know, personally,
their counterparts in the Catholic Churches
that were local to each of them. They
have done this quite well. They have reached
out to the Catholic clergy within their
local areas, and although all ecclesiastical
ventures of this sort are challenging,
they have each maintained peace and a
good rapport with the Catholic Churches
near to them. Thirdly, they were told
not to elevate more men to the Episcopate
than was absolutely necessary, and they
have sought their utmost to do just that.
Bishop Campese and his clergy are
entering a special “group within
the group” of the Patrimony of the
Primate. He is now the Ordinary of the
Pro-Diocese of the Holy Family within
the Patrimony of the Primate. Although
there may be other “groups within
the group” of the Patrimony, Archbishop
Falk and others are a entering in a more
“plain vanilla” status. Either
way, they are all coming together into
this distinct structure so that their
status is clear for the time being, and
this also provides the remaining portion
of the ACA to continue with its business
without a concern for confusion as to
the direction that is being taken by each
member of their particular diocese. We
are now in a “time between the times”
where we await the fullness of the blessings
of communion with the Barque of Peter.
During this time many have spoken of the
need for a “home of our own”
for those of us who are seeking membership
in the Ordinariate. The Patrimony of the
Primate is just that structure. It is
merely temporary so that we may be able
to gather ourselves in a unified manner,
and that we may be clearly counted for
who we are.
Ordinariate festival
– Coomera, Australia
4
February 2011
I have just received this report by e-mail
from Fr Owen Buckton in Australia. He
asked to acknowledge the source as The
Messenger, though the text has not
yet been published there for technical
reasons. It
is now.
* * *
Ordinariate Festival Australia
– a participant reports to The
Messenger.
Those interested in the Ordinariate for
Australia met at St. Stephen’s College
at Coomera on the Gold Coast, a school
affiliated with the Anglican Catholic
Church in Australia, on the invitation
of the hosts Bishop Peter Elliott, Delegate
of the Holy See for the Australian Ordinariate
and Archbishop John Hepworth, Primate
of the Traditional Anglican Communion.
While I was there only for the first two
days it was a wonderful time of discovery,
talking and listening, to each other and
to the Bp. Elliott. There were people
from the Catholic Church, the Anglican
Church, the Anglican Catholic Church,
Church of the Torres Strait, and the Ukrainian
Catholic Church, as well as others.
The festival started with a Mass of the
Holy Spirit according to the usage of
the ACCA of which Archbishop Hepworth
was the celebrant. Perhaps the unique
aspect of this was the two Catholic Bishops
seated in the front pew, Bp. Elliott,
Apostolic Delegate and Bp. Jarrett, Bishop
of Lismore, as well as Fr John Fleming,
and several catholic laymen and women.
The next day was Candlemass and this was
a Catholic concelebration by Bp. Jarrett
(the celebrant), Bp. Elliott, and Fr.
Fleming. The singing was wonderful on
both occasions and one could feel the
movement of the Holy Spirit over each
and every one that was there. Yet there
was brokenness and isolation as we are
not yet one, but the festival such as
this, is the necessary step in healing
the divisions of the past, and taking
seriously Our Lord command, that the Church
become one.
Sharing our stories, listening to each
other, and being there as the unfolding
the Ordinariate takes place, was a central
theme of the conference. Perhaps the most
eloquent was Bp. Elliott who spoke, on
day two, of the way that the Ordinariate
may unfold in Australia. One of the major
things that Bp. Elliott stressed was that
Australia was not England, nor was it
Canada nor was it the USA. The history
of Australian Anglicanism is unique to
itself, so the unfolding of the Ordinariate
will be unique. The Bishop spoke of the
two major divergent streams here in Australia,
the ACCA, those who left, or were driven
out, of the Anglican Church in Australia,
and those who stayed within and tried
to fight the heresies from there. It has
been 23 years since the first ACCA parishes
were formed, so it has developed its own
way of doing things, its own distinctive
Anglican flavour, while those within,
have their ways, their norms, so there
has been a divergence, not an insurmountable
one, but a divergence none the less. Bp.
Elliott emphasised that the coming together
of these two streams of Anglicanism will
mean that the Ordinariate will develop
differently to that in England and Wales,
though there may be some similarities.
In a later talk, Bp. Elliott outlined
the process, as he sees it, in the erection
of the Ordinariate. Firstly, each Anglican
priest who goes into the Australian Ordinariate
will need a Catholic priest sponsor, a
former Anglican priest if possible, a
person who he can be with, befriend, listen
to, confide in, encourage, and just be
there for the man as he prepares for Catholic
ordination, both before and after. This
makes a lot of sense to me, as we will
need hand-holding as a lot of what we
do will be new, especially Canon Law.
Secondly, the laity, each person who joins
the Ordinariate, as I understand it, will
need a Catholic sponsor, one who will
stand by them as they move into the Ordinariate
especially at their Chrismation.
Other people spoke from their hearts
of the joy that healing the breach will
bring; the sorrow that divisions are causing,
and have caused in the past; the need
for faith in the Holy Spirit and in the
people that the Churches have called to
bring the Ordinariate to fruition; the
need to let go of the past and to forgive;
the need to be humble; the need to see
the working of the Holy Spirit; and especially
to pray for the man that will become the
Ordinary (whoever that may be), and his
board.
Of course, I was sad to miss the final
day, as there was to be stories from the
people of the Torres Strait, and more
exploration of the views of what the Ordinariate
means for the people gathered, and how
it may come to fruition. Also, this was
the day that the Australian Ordinariate
Implementation Commitee was having their
inaugural meeting starting after the festival,
but alas my flight was changed, so I hope
someone more eloquent than I will fill
in the gaps, and perhaps give a much fuller
account of what transpired.
As you have perhaps noticed, I have not
talked about the Archbishop as his vision
is known to all, though his presence was
felt by all at the festival. Instead I
have examined what others thought, and
talked about trying to give my thoughts
on what occurred. For me, it was a joyous
occasion, as we explored our different
histories and stories, talked to each
other, overcoming our differences in the
light of healing. What I found at this
festival was a common vision, a vision
in which we are no longer ACCA or TAC
or ACA, but we each belong to the Ordinariate,
part of the Latin Rite, unified under
the See of Peter. I cannot give you a
timeline nor can I give any other definite
except that this is the work of the Holy
Spirit, and truly blessed by God.
Anglican Church in
America Clarifies Position on Ordinariate:
Rome Offer Rejected
6
February 2011
If this report is accurate, it would
seem that the ACA is ipso facto
no longer a member church of the TAC,
going by the way the principles of canon
law usually works.
This is very serious:
It should be stated clearly that there
is no provision in the Constitution
and Canons of the Anglican Church in
America for an entity such as the Patrimony
of the Primate. The Patrimony of the
Primate is not part of the ACA.
It would seem
that they do not recognise a canonical
act of the TAC, which contradicts any
claim to be a part of the TAC. The ACA
is therefore an acephalous (or self-styled
“autocephalous”) body.
Then we have to wait for an official
announcement. I emphasise that this is
my private interpretation, and
I may be wrong.
* * *
From Virtue
Online
Anglican Church in America Clarifies
Position on Ordinariate: “We are
not going to Rome,” Say Leaders
Rt. Rev. Louis Campese Resigns
as Bishop of DEUS. He accepts Rome’s
offer
By David W. Virtue
www.virtueonline.org
February 5, 2011
The Anglican Church in America (ACA),
one of the largest of the Continuing Anglo
Catholic bodies in the US, has issued
a letter through its chancellors saying
it will not join with its Archbishop,
John Hepworth, and accept the Pope’s
offer of a personal ordinariate.
Bishop Brian Marsh, Diocese of the Northeast,
told VOL that this clarifies their situation
which has been in some limbo since the
Pope’s offer due to a number of
parishes in the ACA wanting to accept
the Anglicanorum Coetibus. “While
this clarifies our position at the present
time the future remains open. Our leader
is still Archbishop John Hepworth but
that could change if he should go to Rome.”
The ACA came into being more than 20
years ago as a merger of The American
Episcopal Church (AEC) and about half
of the Anglican Catholic Church (ACC).
The ACA has decided they will not accept
the ordinariate offered by Pope Benedict
XVI at this time and will stay as an orthodox
Anglican body in the US. The ACA is not
recognized by the Anglican Communion or
the Episcopal Church nor is it recognized
by the newly formed Anglican Church in
North America (ACNA).
There is a desire to separate amicably
from those parishes that wish to accept
the pope’s offer commented Marsh.
The bishop believes that about 20% of
the ACA will accept the ordinariate. “We
do regard this as an opportunity for all
Continuing Anglicans to come together,
said Marsh. “We are in talks with
other Continuing Anglican bodies.”
The Chancellor of the ACA today issued
a letter at the request of the bishops
of the Church clarifying where the denomination
stands.
“First, I would like to inform
you that the Anglican Church in America
shall remain as a continuing Anglican
church. Notwithstanding what you may have
heard, this church is not going to collapse
or disappear. It will, by the Grace of
God, continue its important and essential
witness as part of God’s holy church.
“Second, we would like to advise
you as to the situation in the Diocese
of the Eastern United States which has
been the one diocese most gravely affected
by what has happened. As all of you may
know, the Bishop of this DEUS (Louis Campese)
has elected to abandon his diocese when
the diocese refused to go to the Roman
Catholic Ordinariate.
“Of the twenty-five parishes and
missions in the diocese, approximately
ten parishes and missions have elected
to remain with this church. These ten
parishes and missions, effectively abandoned
by Bishop Campese, will form the nucleus
of a new diocese.
“While the majority of the parishes
and missions chose to go with Bishop Campese,
the majority of the laity has elected
to remain with the diocese. Bishop Campese
brought a number of missions into the
diocese in the eighteen (18) months prior
to leaving the diocese.
“We have chosen to stay together,
to remain with the ACA, and should shortly
be conducting a search for a new bishop.
“With regard to the dioceses of
the Northeast, Missouri Valley and West,
I should advise you that these dioceses
will remain with the Anglican Church in
America. Notwithstanding that misinformation
and misstatements have been made, these
three (3) dioceses remain strong and viable.
A majority of parishes, missions and clergy
have chosen to remain with the ACA. These
dioceses are lead by very faithful and
Godfearing bishops.”
The chancellor also wrote that the Constitution
and Canons of the ACA are still valid
and binding.
“According to our canons, those
Bishops, clergy and parishes who leave
for another jurisdiction, such as a Roman
Catholic Ordinariate or the so-called
Patrimony of the Primate, have, at this
time abandoned the communion of this church
and the ACA.
“With deep regret, the ACA declares
that they are no longer a part of the
ACA, nor do they have authority of jurisdiction
in any ACA diocese or parish, and ordinations
and other ecclesiastical actions performed
by them are null and void effective as
of January 1, 2011.
“It should be stated clearly that
there is no provision in the Constitution
and Canons of the Anglican Church in America
for an entity such as the Patrimony of
the Primate. The Patrimony of the Primate
is not part of the ACA.
“In April of this year, the House
of Bishops and Executive Council of our
church will meet in Tucson, Arizona. It
is the judgment of this office that only
those clergy who remain within the Anglican
Church in America and faithfully perform
their offices therein will be permitted
to exercise leadership, voice and vote
in the House of Bishops and/or the Executive
Council of the Anglican Church in America.”
The letter was signed by the following
individuals:
James S. Elkins, Jr. Chancellor, ACA
and Diocese of the Eastern United States
Walter W. Jones, Jr. Chancellor Diocese
of the Northeast Eugene Van Voorhis, Chancellor
Emeritus Diocese of the Northeast
Tara Keehr, Chancellor Diocese of the
Missouri Valley
David Smith, Chancellor Diocese of the
West
“We are planning a major gathering
of continuing Anglicans in November in
Boston, Mass. The separation brings clarity
for Anglo Catholics who wish to remain
authentic Anglicans who use both the 1662
and 1928 Prayer Book and American and
Anglican Missals,” said Marsh.
A Reflection about
the American Bishops
7
February 2011
We do so much tend to heap it on, and
all of a sudden, the three ACA bishops
are being called all sorts of names and
attributed all kinds of motivations for
their pretentions to some kind of legitimacy
and “foundation myths”. The moment had
to come for the separation between those
who believe in their own legitimacy and
those who believe that the present situation
of splintered church groups is not ideal
and that the real call from God is to
contribute to the cause of Christian unity
in the universal Church.
America has a long tradition of liberalism
in everything from business and trade
to the most outlandish expressions of
religious entrepreneurism. Cults fall
foul of the law when they actually do
quantifiable harm to people. Otherwise,
over there, one is free to worship according
to any religious tradition or invent one’s
own. In such an environment of religious
freedom and lack of any constraint by
means or law or social convention, anything
can happen, from the most positive and
beautiful to the most fanatical and distorted.
The issue of religious freedom as a “human
right” is sometimes an issue of heated
discussion. Can error have rights? Must
a Catholic state allow Protestants not
only to establish places of worship but
also to proselytise among Catholics and
convert them to their community? What
are the limits? In our times, there are
no Catholic monarchies, dictatorships
or republics, and most secular regimes
allow people to practice whatever religion
they want within the limits of public
order. The legally-imposed bar in most
western countries is very low.
America is beginning to get the first
tastes of anti-religious bigotry as secularists
react against fundamentalist theocracy.
We in Europe have had persecution for
centuries. Though anti-clericalism in
the public sphere has been terrible, the
population has for the most part simply
got on with life.
Here in Europe, the limits of religious
practice and proselytism are more the
domain of social convention than law.
England is an exception as are some other
countries where the Reformation got a
solid hold. Here in France, there has
always been a Protestant minority which
has been fairly well tolerated over the
past couple of hundred years. People of
non-Christian religions are unhindered
and they have their synagogues, mosques
and temples. Most people are at least
nominal Catholics, or at least have been
until relatively recently. The light of
Christianity is being extinguished.
There is also a phenomenon of “parallel
churches”, Christian communities that
came into existence at the fringes of
Catholicism and Orthodoxy. Some of those
churches have a long history and are stable
in social terms like the Old Catholics,
and the Petite Eglise in France
consisting entirely of laity. We could
now include those Catholic traditionalists
who are still in an irregular situation
in relation to Rome. Others are more eccentric
and based on the ambitions of individuals
rather than communities with a grievance.
Not all the “little churches” are “in
continuation” from the Church of origin
(usually the Catholic Church) of their
founders. Some are involved with Gnosticism
or theosophy, private revelations and
apparitions. Others have much in common
with a kind of medieval popular religion
spurned by the mainstream, often an opportunity
for unscrupulous clergy to make a dishonest
living from exorcisms, prayers of healing,
selling blessed objects and so forth.
Much as one may have a certain amount
of sympathy for such clergy who have undergone
suffering in their lives, and seek to
restore something that has disappeared
from the mainstream, they are not socially
acceptable in European countries. As my
wife said “The problem is not
that they are cults, but they are clowns
and no one takes them seriously“.
This may help to explain why continuing
Anglicanism has had so little success
in England, and why belonging to the Church
and attending services are more a matter
of social convention than religious conviction.
It is numbing for the clergy and the devout
laity, but it is the sober reality. This
is why people continue to attend services
in the mainstream churches or drop out
of religious practice altogether. I remember,
as a choirboy, occasionally going to sing
at an ecumenical service in the local
Methodist chapel – and wondering if we
were not doing “something wrong”. We did
not despise “non-conformists”, but they
were simply “off our radar scanner”. We
joked about being “on the meths tonight”
(meths being short for methylated spirit).
Meanwhile, Methodism is a part of English
mainstream Christianity, especially in
the North and industrial towns.
Our instinct this side of the Atlantic
eschews what has been termed “alphabet
soup”, that tendency to create splinter
groups and claim that they have a “connection
of legitimacy” from mainstream Episcopalianism
in some tenuous way. One would think that
some of those men are desperate to “triangulate”
themselves away from what they and the
mainstream Churches would call episcopi
vagantes. “Hell is other people”
(L’enfer c’est les autres) –
said Jean-Paul Sartre, the French existentialist
philosopher.
We all have to wake up one morning and
realise we are practically all in the
same boat. I as a priest am no more “legitimate”
than any of those rivalling and duelling
bishops in the USA, but I do have the
realism, like my Archbishop, to realise
that the TAC is no more than a field
hospital to welcome lay folk and
clergy who have had enough of the changes
and distortions of the mainstream Churches.
We see a door of the Catholic Church open,
wide in some places and timidly in others,
and we approach cautiously. The door might
not be open for us but for someone else,
and we are afraid to see that door slam
in our faces.
Some have waited in our “field hospital”
for decades, and men like Archbishop Falk
and Bishop Mercer built it with their
bare hands. Archbishop Hepworth has led
it with determination and a will of iron,
not to show his “legitimacy” but to bring
us all to the unity of Christ’s one Church.
We exist for the Church, not
for ourselves. This is why the TAC has
never been particularly well-organised
with bureaucracy and codes of canons other
than local rules to keep things reasonably
in shape. The Americans were hotter on
bureaucracy and the “myth of legitimacy”
than anyone else. They saw the “field
hospital” not as something provisional
and temporary to bring us through a difficult
situation, but almost as a new establishment,
permanent and a fiefdom to be guarded.
I have tended to mock this kind of thing
in the “Ruritania” posts, which I have
now deleted. I regret having been childish,
but the intuitions are still there. Where
is that balance between being a devout
Christian and fitting in with society
and its acceptable standards? We can revolt
and become marginal, or we can become
urban conformists, or try to strike a
balance. We have all been badly wounded
in our spiritual odysseys, and I often
wonder whether it is all worth it, but
something continues to push me on.
We indeed “have no abiding city”, not
even our “ramshackle” TAC – but which
for me represents the difference between
continuing as a priest or not, since a
priest has to be under the oversight of
a bishop. But, from the beginning, I knew
it would only be provisional and would
last five or ten years before we had to
give our account to Rome. I don’t understand
the minds of those American bishops. Intellectually,
it seems fairly straightforward, but my
gut reacts by wondering if they really
believe their marginal situation is definitive,
abiding and permanent. Continue for too
long like this, and we wither and die
like the severed branch we are. Are they
conscious of that? I suppose that American
religious freedom enables them
to live from their ministries and remain
in a comfort zone.
As I mentioned above, the light is being
extinguished over here. The darkness is
coming, and yet, American clerics still
compete for “legitimacy”. It all seems
so pointless this side of the Atlantic.
It seems almost obscene…
Developments in the Continuum
7
February 2011
There is an article
by Robin G. Jordan in a blog called Anglicans
Ablaze. It appears to support the
prevailing American Continuing Anglican
anti-ordinariate position. I give this
link purely for information.
He resumes the theme about the three
ACA bishops having made the decision they
have made with all its consequences. Archbishop
Hepworth has clearly stated his position
which simply involves the provision of
structures for Anglicans who need to take
more time about their decision of whether
to join an Ordinariate, but who remain
open-minded. Perhaps in the future, the
TAC College of Bishops will decide what
to do with the three dissidents, having
provided an alternative for their clergy
and faithful (if they want it). It is
not for me to say.
There is a hint in the light of this
piece of evidence that the ACA is
pursuing agreements with the Anglican
Province of America. There may not be
an actual merger, so we must be prudent.
The dialogue between the two bodies is
not news to us.
Mr Jordan then goes on to quote an old
letter of Bishop Daren Williams, which
we already know about. He then observes
that the Diocese of the Eastern United
States (DEUS) has no website, which is
hardly surprising since it is vacant from
the ACA’s point of view.
There is very little new here, but there
it is.?
Official Statement
from Archbishop Hepworth
7
February 2011
Traditional Anglican
Communion
Office
of the Primate
Archbishop
John Hepworth
7th February 2011
Statement
on the situation in the Anglican Church
in America
I deeply regret the action that has been
precipitated by the three bishops of the
Traditional Anglican Communion in the
United States. They find themselves unable
to accept the Apostolic Constitution Anglicanorum
Coetibus, and unable to support the
unanimous decisions of the College of
Bishops of the TAC to “come into the fullness
of Catholic Communion”.
This need not and should not be the case.
I have been part of many phone conferences
this year with the US bishops of the TAC.
I have written to the three dissenting
bishops urging them to accept the responsibility
that their position entails. I have reminded
them that it is not open to a bishop of
the TAC to dissent on the major policy
of the TAC and remain a member of the
College of Bishops.
In a pastoral response to their difficulties,
I have established with their consent
a grouping of clergy, parishes and individual
faithful who have made a firm intention
to join the United States Ordinariate
on its establishment. I have appointed
Bishop David Moyer as my representative
for this purpose, and have more recently
appointed Bishop Louis Campese to the
pastoral oversight of those coming from
his Diocese into the Ordinariate.
This use of the Patrimony of the Primate
was approved by all the bishops of the
Anglican Church in America. It was agreed
that those involved could stay in their
own parishes, but under the episcopal
jurisdiction of a bishop entering the
Ordinariate. It is a strictly temporary
device to allow those entering the Ordinariate,
and those not yet entering, freedom to
make their own plans without the canonical
harassment that is now occurring.
I also note that ordinations in the TAC
(in regions where Ordinariates are in
formation) are only occurring at this
time to satisfy urgent pastoral needs,
and after reference to the Delegates of
the Holy See where they have been appointed.
The facts of the TAC acceptance of the
Apostolic Constitution in the United States
are as follows:
- Six bishops have submitted dossiers
(the formal step to seeking ordination
in the Ordinariate)
- Sixty one clergy have made similar
written submissions
- Twenty-nine parishes have voted to
seek membership of the Ordinariate when
it is formed.
I have already indicated to the bishops
of the TAC that I am calling a Plenary
Meeting of the College of Bishops of the
TAC immediately after Easter this year.
One of the purposes of that meeting is
to discuss the ongoing pastoral and sacramental
care of those not yet ready to commit
themselves to membership of the Ordinariates
that are now being developed around the
world. A further purpose of the meeting
is to discuss the ongoing role of the
Traditional Anglican Communion in post-Ordinariate
Anglicanism.
That meeting remains the appropriate
venue for forming (and challenging) the
policies of our Communion.
I must remind everyone of the following:
- Christian Unity is not an option for
the Church. It is the will of Jesus
Christ, made clear in the Gospels.
- For Anglicans, the healing of the
separation from Catholic communion at
the Reformation must be the first act
of Christian Unity.
- The Church is a living entity: the
Spirit-filled Body of Christ, with the
means and the mission to discern and
proclaim the truth revealed in Jesus
Christ.
- Anglicans do not, in and of themselves,
possess that means.
- The renewal of the ARCIC conversations
and the ongoing work of the Orthodox/Roman
Catholic Conversations are evidence
of the acceptance of the need to find
unity by the historic churches of East
and West.
- To be truly “catholic” demands that
one is in Eucharistic Communion with
the Church led by the successor of Peter.
From the most ancient times, that has
been the understanding of “all the churches”.
The tragedy of Continuing Anglicanism
– and indeed of the Anglican Communion
– is the absence of Eucharistic Communion
with anyone but itself.
It was to carry the dreams unleashed
by the first ARCIC conversations that
the TAC was formed. Eventually, it grew
in grace and maturity sufficiently to
petition the Holy See for the fulfilment
of those dreams. The petition, with the
petitions of other Anglicans, was answered.
Anglicans, with their unique Patrimony
but with true unity of faith, are now
gathering in unique structures.
No one need gather quickly. The gathering
will be long, and sometimes arduous. But
gather we must.
Each of us can turn to those ahead of
us on this journey into truth and unity,
and seek help. We can turn to those behind
us, and offer help.
It is Christian to help. It is not Christian
to hinder.
+ John Hepworth, Primate
Press Release on the
“Ordinariate Festival”
MEDIA
RELEASE
FESTIVAL
CELEBRATES THE AUSTRALIAN ORDINARIATE
An Australian Ordinariate Festival was
held at St Stephen’s College, Coomera,
Queensland, between February 1 – 3.
Anglicans from all States came together
with Catholics to understand more about
Pope Benedict’s offer of a Personal Ordinariate
for former Anglicans seeking full communion
with the Church. Participants included
clergy, laity and religious women from
the official Anglican Church of Australia
(ACA) and the Anglican Catholic Church
in Australia (Traditional Anglican Communion:
TAC). Bishop Tolowa Nona of the Church
of the Torres Strait (TAC) was accompanied
by priests and laity.
Archbishop John Hepworth, Primate of
the TAC, hosted the festival at the campus
St Stephen’s College, Coomera, of which
he is the chairman. He celebrated a solemn
Anglican Eucharist in the college chapel
to open the festival. On February 2, Bishop
Geoffrey Jarrett of Lismore celebrated
the Catholic liturgy for the Presentation
of the Lord, with the customary blessing
of candles.
The Episcopal Delegate for the Ordinariate,
Bishop Peter Elliott, said that he sensed
strong feelings of anticipation and enthusiasm
among participants. Archbishop Hepworth
said that many people are looking forward
to the establishment of an Australian
Ordinariate.
“Difficult questions were raised frankly.”
said Bishop Elliott, “But I was moved
when people gave testimonies of their
journeys towards the Ordinariate. We all
came to understand the urgent pastoral
need for this unique community in full
communion with the Successor of St Peter.”
After the festival, a national implementation
committee representing all groups met
for the first time to tackle practical
issues. Local Ordinariate working groups
are also being established in the States.
On February 26 another Ordinariate Festival
will be held in Perth, at Holy Family
church Como, hosted by Bishop Harry Entwistle
(TAC). Other festivals are envisaged for
Melbourne, Sydney and Adelaide to inform
people as plans for an Australian Ordinariate
take shape.
Archbishop Hepworth
gives Virtueonline an exclusive
As a part of his caring for everyone
mode, the TAC Archbishop established a
Patrimony of the Primate with ACA Bishop
David Moyer tapped to lead it. As a result,
Bishop Campese, with the permission and
authority of Bishop Moyer, has developed
the Pro-diocese of the Holy Family. In
so doing he has formally been transferred,
as the ACA Bishop Ordinary of the Diocese
of the Eastern United States, into the
newly developing Pro-diocese of the Holy
Family.
“After many months of discussion
with my Standing Committee, I have transferred
and not resigned,” explained Bishop
Campese in a phone call with VOL. “I
have a Letter of Transfer to the Patrimony
of the Primate and the Pro-diocese of
the Holy Family.”
“I have transferred out. I have
not resigned, nor I did not ‘abandon’
them,” the Florida-based Bishop
continued. “The ‘A’
word that was used was incorrect.”
Bishop Moyer also communicated to VOL
that Bishop Falk is still President of
the ACA House of Bishops. He has not resigned
as has been reported on the ACA website.
The three bishops have taken it upon themselves
to make internal changes in the Anglican
Church of America without persmission.
Basically, the Patrimony of the Primate
is a subgroup of ACA clergy and the faithful,
who are ready, willing and able to enter
into the American Ordinariate as soon
as it is established in the United States.
So far, 40 priests and their respective
congregations have made the move from
the Diocese of the Eastern United States
into the Pro-diocese of the Holy Family
with Bishop Campese.
The Pro-diocese is temporarily set up
to help facilitate an orderly transfer
of ACA Anglicans desiring membership in
the American Ordinariate when it is finally
established in the United States and ultimately
towards becoming communicant members the
Roman Catholic Church.
“The use of the Patrimony of the
Primate was approved by all the bishops
of the Anglican Church in America. It
was agreed that those involved could stay
in their own parishes, but under the episcopal
jurisdiction of a bishop entering the
Ordinariate.” Archbishop Hepworth
writes in his clarifying statement. “It
is a strictly temporary device to allow
those entering the Ordinariate, and those
not yet entering, freedom to make their
own plans without the canonical harassment
that is now occurring.”
Archbishop Hepworth was quick to point
out and make very clear that not all ACA
members (bishops, priests or the faithful)
are ready, willing or able to be included
in the American Ordinariate or embrace
Roman Catholicism at this time. Therefore,
extraordinary care must be given to ensure
that those who stay behind will receive
continuing ministry and Sacramental care
in the manner to which they are accustomed
and expect.
“I think eventually there will
be an ACA which remains,” the Archbishop
theorized but he doesn’t know what
shape the American church or the TAC will
take in post-Ordinariate Anglicanism.
Australian Ordinariate
hits Delays
11
February 2011
The roller coaster has taken another
dive… Or has it, given the source?
They are carried up to the heaven,
and down again to the deep : their soul
melteth away because of the trouble.
Tablet:
Australian Ordinariate hits delays
The Tablet has published the
following comments:
The Australian Catholic bishop responsible
for the ordinariate for disaffected Anglicans
in Australia says there is no final date
yet for its establishment, casting doubt
on an expected Pentecost start. Bishop
Peter Elliott told The Tablet that Australia
could not follow all that Britain had
done in establishing an ordinariate because
of differences between the two countries,
such as the distances between congregations
that would form an ordinariate in Australia.
From here: http://www.thetablet.co.uk/latest-news.php
* * *
This could simply be spin meaning that
the Australian Ordinariate is not on exactly
the same time scale as the English one.
In any case, the decision is in the hands
of the CDF after having heard Bishop Elliott’s
recommendations. It can’t be any
other way.
The Most Accessible
Primate in the World
From this article – Anglican
Church in America struggles with identity
and commitment to Rome
The Archbishop is planning on coming
over to the United States in a few weeks
as the beginning leg of a global trot
to touch bases with various TAC groups.
He plans on meeting with Cardinal Wuerl
and also go on to Toronto to meet with
Archbishop Thomas Collins, the Canadian
liaison for the Anglican Ordinariate.
Then the Australian primate will jet to
the UK to meet with Father Keith Newton,
the new Ordinary for the Our Lady of Walsingham
Ordinariate. While in England, Archbishop
Hepworth will visit the various TAC congregations
there.
Archbishop Hepworth, who describes himself
as “the most accessible primate
in the world”, said he has been
asked by William Cardinal Levada to keep
up his travels and to continue to help
with ushering Anglicans into the Catholic
Church.
“I’ve been asked by Cardinal
Levada to continue doing what I have been
doing,” he said. “And I have
said that I will stand aside as soon as
Rome asks me to.
“I have led my people around the
world into obedience to the Holy Father,”
the Archbishop continued. “I can
hardly start be being disobedient myself.
So I’ll do whatever they say. I
am extremely peaceful about that.”
AUSTRALIA:
Clergyman commits crimes against children
but opposes women priests
This is an obnoxious article about an
Australian priest who committed abominable
acts, and Archbishop Hepworth had the
diligence to do the right thing –
report the man to the police and engage
a lawyer. I wonder what the group mentioned
below is. It’s certainly not one
of ours!
“Meanwhile, a number of former
Anglican colleagues of Wilfred Edwin Dennis
are in discussions with the Vatican in
2011, with a view to being accepted (as
a group) into the Roman Catholic Church,
where they will be safe from such horrors
as the ordination of women priests“.
Note: I have received
this information -
Broken Rites which was responsible
for the article about Wilfred Dennis is
a group which purports to be one supporting
the victims of clerical abuse. It is rather
biased and selective in its reporting
as you may have noticed from the article.
Archbishop Hepworth acted in a responsible
manner in this case while trying to pastorally
care for the accused. He was a witness
at the trial and as the affair dragged
on for so many years. It was a burden
he could have done without.
Detailed report on
Australia from Inside the Vatican
In
addition to all lay ministries being continued,
it was stressed that preferred communion
postures and modes of reception would
be likely to be continued too.
Most Anglo-Catholics kneel for communion,
and receive it under both species, and
this is likely to be the norm in the Ordinariate.
Bishop Elliott also got down to the practicalities,
saying that membership in the
Ordinariate by interested persons will
be sought by a formal application in writing.
Archbishop Hepworth and the secretary
of the College of Bishops Ms Cheryl Woodman
were busy collecting dossiers of a number
of their priests, which will be submitted
with the objective of receiving holy orders
in the Ordinariate.
Elliott said that evidence of
baptism will be required. Entrance into
the ordinariate will be by way of sacramental
reconciliation (confession), a profession
of faith and Confirmation with Chrism.
Sharing in the one Eucharist will complete
these sacramental steps of coming into
full communion with the Church.
-snip-
Archbishop Hepworth said, “The Apostolic
Constitution deliberately avoids the use
of the word Roman, repeating a Vatican
II ecclesiology of communion which resonates
with Anglicans.” But as Bishop Jarrett
indicates, “All people received into the
Ordinariate, will become Catholic. The
Book of Common Prayer was based on the
old Sarum rite of the Catholic Church,
which will also find its expression in
the liturgy of the Ordinariate.”
-snip-
Fr
John Fleming, Anglican convert to Catholicism
in Australia whose conversion made all
the headlines in 1987 said that Bishop
Elliott’s perceptions of the riches contained
in the Apostolic Constitution reflected
not only the letter, but the spirit of
the document.
John McCarthy QC, a Catholic barrister
in Sydney who is assisting the upcoming
Ordinariate with legal issues said, “The
apostolic constitution contains an interesting
nomenclature, unlike other Vatican documents,
and one can tell that it was written in
English first.”
Bishop Elliott cautioned however that,
“We can’t let the Ordinariate be a Jurassic
Park. We must keep the doors open.”
Fr Christopher Seton, Anglican parish
priest of All Saints the Melbourne suburb
of Kooyong agreed and said, “This is not
an Anglican preservation society. Unless
we are evangelistic, and only like a museum
where people enjoy old treasures, we will
eventually die out. The beauty of the
Ordinariate is that it allows us to be
united without being absorbed.”
More news about the
Canadian Ordinariate conference
14
February 2011
I hear that registration for the conference
Mar. 24-26 in Mississauga has hit 90 (the
venue holds about 75 ) and among them
will be 40 Anglican Catholic Church of
Canada clergy. So if that is true—this
is third hand info I am working with—then
that means just about every priest in
the Canadian TAC will be there except
those too aged to travel.
From the comments section of The Anglo-Catholic,
one of the Toronto area Anglicans writes
(my bolds).:
In Toronto momentum is growing and
the March 24 – 26 conference at Queen
of Apostles Retreat Centre near Toronto
Pearson Int. Airport will gather people
from across the country and the USA
from the AU, Anglican Church of Canada
and the TAC and possibly the Ordinariate
of OLW in the UK.
The conference will be a historic
and organizationally crucial gathering
with Fr. Phillips joining Archbishop
Collins, the host. The same week both
Cardinal Wuerl and Fr. Aidan Nichols
are to be in Toronto. Fr Nichols,
a godfather of the Ordinariate, author,
theologican and international Dominican
scholar recognized for his work on
Balthazar and a consultant to the
Holy Father is to address the Ordinariate
conference along with Fr. Phillips
and others.
Following the conference a Toronto
Ordinariate study group will be announced
and will meet weekly beginning in
April in a Toronto Catholic Parish
(details in a few weeks).
There’s another pin for the
map Brother Stephen and a pin that
will represent in a few years hundreds
DV, in the city which once was largely
Anglican and still has the largest
concentration of those of Anglican
heritage in the country.
Clarification by Archbishop
Hepworth about Bishop David Moyer
16
February 2011
This is a comment under the Anglo-Catholic
posting Indications
of a Strong Beginning. I post it here
because I know some people have been asking
questions about Bishop David Moyer.
I can also affirm that Bishop Michael
Gill, his family and his flock in South
Africa remain loyal to the TAC and Archbishop
Hepworth. I also ask your prayers for
Mrs Dalene Gill and the soul of her father
who has recently passed away.
* * *
I hope I can provide the honest answer
that has been requested concerning the
ecclesial status of Bishop Moyer. He
was deposed from the clergy of the TEC
by Bishop Bennison, and lost the court
case that followed. He is therefore
not in any way a clergyman of the TEC.
He has remained as parish priest in
a parish whose buildings are part of
the TEC. His parish intends to join
the US Ordinariate. At this time, he
is a bishop in good standing in the
TAC. The Patrimony of the Primate in
the US has been accepted until the past
two weeks by all the bishops of the
ACA, the US province of the TAC. There
is now some contesting in the ACA of
the status of bishops and clergy in
the Patrimony (a strictly temporary
device until the Ordinariate is erected).
It should be appreciated that in the
highly belligerent environment of TEC,
it has not always been wise to signal
one’s intentions too soon. As
a frequent visitor to Good Shepherd,
and Bishop Moyer’s consecrator,
I have never been in any doubt about
his ecclesial position. But it has been
wise to keep the TEC in doubt. Fortunately,
the Ordinariate is regarded as a more
honest destination than ACNA by some
of the belligerents, and the situation
for very brave people such as we find
at Rosemont is becoming a little better.
In short, he is leading his people to
the Ordinariate as part of the TAC contingent.
And he is doing the same in England
as Episcopal Visitor to the TAC there.
Six ACA bishops headed
to Ordinariate
16
February 2011
This is a couple of days old, and we
have already heard about six American
bishops joining the future US Ordinariate.
What foxes me is that the Japanese can
belong to the Australian Ordinariate,
but not the Puerto Ricans to the US Ordinariate
or the Scottish to the English Ordinariate.
These ‘diaspora’ situations
do need to be cleared up – and quickly.
* * *
Source
TAC Archbishop: Six bishops, 61 priests
and 29 congregations will join up.
By Mary Ann Mueller
Special Correspondent
www.virtueonline.org
Feb. 14, 2011
Archbishop John Hepworth, the Primate
of the Australian-based Traditional Anglican
Communion (TAC), and its American branch
— the Anglican Church in America
(ACA) — has announced that six ACA
bishops are strongly considering joining
the Anglican Ordinariate once it becomes
established on this side of the Atlantic.
“We have six bishops and 61 ACA
priests who have put in dossiers applying
to be clergy of the Ordinariate, and 29
parishes have voted and indicated to Cardinal
Donald Wuerl that they have voted from
the ACA into the Ordinariate,” said
Hepworth.
The ACA House of Bishops has a census
of 10 including Bishop Juan Garcia of
Puerto Rico. Earlier this month three
ACA bishops communicated to VOL that they
are unwilling to be a part of the developing
Ordinariate. They include: Bishop Brian
Marsh, Diocese of the Northeast; Bishop
Stephen Strawn, Diocese of the Missouri
Valley; and Bishop Daren Williams, Diocese
of the West.
“We are not going to Rome. We have
chosen to stay together, to remain with
the ACA,” the three bishops emphatically
stated in a VOL Exclusive. “With
regard to the dioceses of the Northeast,
Missouri Valley and West, we should advise
you that these dioceses will remain with
the Anglican Church in America.”
The six US bishops are: Louis Falk, the
President of the ACA House of Bishops
and the retired bishop of the Diocese
of the Missouri Valley, and the first
Primate of the Traditional Anglican Communion;
David Moyer, the Bishop-in-Charge of the
Patrimony of the Primate and Bishop of
the Armed Forces; Louis Campese, the Bishop
of the Pro-diocese of the Holy Family
and the resigned bishop of the Diocese
of the Eastern United States; George Langberg,
retired Bishop of the Diocese of the Northeast;
Welborne Hudson, retired Bishop of the
Armed Forces; and James Stewart, retired
Bishop of the West.
Archbishop Hepworth also noted in a recent
e-mail to VOL that ACA Bishop Juan Garcia,
Bishop of Puerto Rico, is also interested
in the Ordinariate. But since, unlike
The Episcopal Church, the United States
Conference of Catholic Bishops does not
extend past US borders, the Puerto Rican
bishop will have to become a part of a
Caribbean Ordinariate when and if it is
established.
Father Scott Hurd, Cardinal Wuerl’s
liaison to the Catholic Conference of
Bishops ad hoc committee for the Ordinariate
told VOL, from his office in Washington,
DC, that the current status of the American
Ordinariate is that the ball is now back
in the Vatican’s court.
“It’s public knowledge that
we have concluded the information gathering
stage,” Fr. Hurd noted. “That
information has been communicated to the
CFD (Congregation for the Doctrine of
the Faith) in Rome. They are the decision
making agency. So in a sense the ball
is in the CDF’s court.”
It is now up to Cardinal William Levada
to decide the next step in the erection
of an American Ordinariate.
“It is the CDF’s decision.
I think conditions are very favorable
for the establishment of an Ordinariate
in the United States,” Fr. Hurd
noted. “Things in England have been
happening with great rapidity. One can
hope that things will be processed quickly
for the United States as well.”
Archbishop Hepworth willingly acknowledges
that there will be an ACA remnant remaining
once the Ordinariate is established.
“I think enviably there will be
an ACA which remains,” the Archbishop
said, although he doesn’t know what
shape the American church or the TAC will
take in post-Ordinariate Anglicanism.
Archbishop Hepworth
on TAC Ecclesiology
17
February 2011
I found an interesting article by Fr
Andrew Bartus on his blog – New
Ecclesiology or Old Confusion? – this
morning and informed my Archbishop about
this discussion, since it is not for the
first time. Again, we are confronted with
different people using the same terminology
but meaning different things – that is
how we humans are. Then we understand
words etymologically, culturally, rationally,
emotionally and so forth.
One of these terms is the adjective Roman
to the noun Catholic. Etymologically,
Roman means “of Rome”, culturally
it is a way of distinguishing Catholics
in communion with the Pope from other
Christians of Catholic (or Catholic-like
if you prefer) practice and belief but
who are not in communion with the Pope
in the institutional canonical meaning
of this word. Emotionally, to dyed-in-the-wool
Anglicans and old-fashioned Protestants,
Roman Catholic means one of those
nasty Jesuit plotters in the seventeenth
century and who seem to perpetuate themselves
as bogeymen today.
Another word is conversion. Etymologically,
conversion means “turning”, turning
from unbelief to belief, from sin to virtue,
a radical U-turn in life. Culturally it
means changing one’s religion or ecclesial
tradition within Christianity. Emotionally,
it often means complete denial of one’s
past life to embrace Catholicism as a
totalitarian ideology and drink it to
the dregs.
As someone across the Atlantic recently
said, it is not a question of words and
terminology, but one of substance, of
real meaning, of theological truths. All
these violent polemics have been caused
by the three “dissident” bishops
in the ACA having broken with the common
decision of the TAC bishops in October
2007 to ask Rome for guidance in view
to some kind of corporate reunion.
Anglicanorum Coetibus and its
Complementary Norms need to be
studied in greater depth to discern both
their theological content and the canon
legal aspect as the law of the Church
is adapted to meet a special pastoral
situation.
Have we gone on for too long allowing
opinions to be voiced according to which
the TAC expected to become some kind of
uniate Church? After an unkind anonymous
comment tarring all continuing Anglicans
with the same brush, we find a comment
by Archbishop Hepworth:
* * *
The precise wording that concludes the
TAC Petition is this:
“we seek a communal and ecclesial
way of being Anglican Catholics in communion
with the Holy See, at once treasuring
the full expression of catholic faith
and treasuring our tradition within which
we have come to this moment. We seek the
guidance of the Holy See as to the fulfillment
of these our desires and those of the
churches in which we have been called
to serve.”
I don’t know of anywhere that official
documents use the phrase “communion
but not absorbed”. Earlier in the
Petition, we quoted Paul VI to the Archbishop
of Canterbury in the Basilica of Saint
Paul, when the Pope used the Phrase “united
but not absorbed’.
The first sentence of Anglicanorum Coetibus
speaks of groups of Anglicans petitioning
the Holy See “to be received into
full Catholic communion individually as
well as corporately”.
In the fifth paragraph of the preamble
to the Constitution, the Holy Father says
“this Apostolic Constitution provides
the general normative structure for regulating
the institution and life of Personal Ordinariates
for those Anglican faithful who desire
to enter into the full communion of the
Catholic Church in a corporate manner”.
Those final words of the TAC Petition
stress that the TAC seeks such “fullness
of Catholic Communion” because its
bishops hold the ” full expression
of catholic faith”. That phrase
has already been defined in the third
of the concluding considerations, where
the petitioners stated:
“3. We accept that the most complete
and authentic expression and application
of the catholic faith in this moment of
time is found in the Catechism of the
Catholic Church and its Compendium, which
we have signed together with this Letter
as attesting to the faith we aspire to
teach and hold.”
The “fullness of Catholic Communion”
could not possibly be interpreted as “intercommunion”
in which the faith held and taught by
the bishops remains undefined in a catholic
sense. Since the bishops signed the Cathecism
and the (much simpler) Compendium, I was
confident at the time that the point was
understood. We used the phrase “we
aspire to teach and hold” because
we did not wish to give the impression
that we were the only ones in the world
with a perfect understanding of such matters
in the Catechism as the doctrine of the
Trinity. The Catechism is the best summary
of the Catholic Faith available at the
moment, we aspire to hold and teach its
contents.
The language of the Petition and the
Apostolic Constitution repays close study.
But nobody could possibly claim that the
Petition sought inter-communion without
transformation. Some TAC churches (most,
in fact) responded by buying boxes of
Catechisms in every language from English
to Swahili, and were well into their study
programs before the Constitution appeared.
No surprises.
Unfortunately, there were some dioceses
in the US who scarcely mentioned the Petition
until twelve months ago, and their people
rightly claim secrecy. We agreed with
the Holy See that the Petition would be
published when the Constitution was published,
so that they could be read together. But
official TAC publications had been giving
summaries for the previous two years,
and far from feeling secretive, were studying
the Catechism in anticipation of a positive
answer.
Update on Anglicanorum
coetibus conference
Thank you for your interest in the
upcoming Anglicanorum Coetibus conference
in the Archdiocese of Toronto. A program
committee is working to finalize details
for our March 24-26 conference. Our plan
is to provide more complete information
in this space by February 11, 2011.
Update – February 18, 2011
Please note that as of February 18,
2011, overnight accommodation at Queen
of Apostles has been filled to capacity.
The Archdiocese has reserved a block of
rooms at the Admiral Inn, 6 km from the
Retreat Centre for guests that still require
overnight arrangements. Click
here for more information regarding
these arrangements.
We apologize for the delay in providing
additional details on the conference program.
We have some exciting additions to the
conference that will be announced shortly.
Due to these changes, we are still finalizing
details regarding the schedule and hope
to have a further update available by
February 18. Thank you for your patience.
We are pleased to announce that
Father Aidan Nichols, O.P. has agreed
to join us as a keynote speaker for the
conference. Scroll to the bottom of this
page for more information on Father Nichols
and the tremendous experience he will
bring to our gathering.
In the interim, we recognize that
many are looking to make travel plans
and wish to have details around timing
especially the beginning/ending of the
conference to make arrangements as appropriate.
Our tentative program includes the
following:
Thursday, March 24, 2011
– Our opening session will take place
in the early evening, likely 7:00 p.m.
at which time we will welcome all delegates,
join together in prayer and have our first
session together. Following the opening
session, all delegates will be invited
to participate in a wine/cheese reception
as we build fellowship on our first evening
together.
Friday, March 25, 2011- A
full day is planned beginning with breakfast
at 8 a.m. The day will include prayer,
numerous presentations and the opportunity
to engage in dialogue. Our tentative schedule
concludes with dinner, providing a free
evening for delegates to enjoy.
Saturday, March 26, 2011
– We will continue with prayer & sessions
on Saturday morning, concluding with lunch
at which time delegates will return home,
armed with the wisdom and knowledge gained
through our time together.
Keynote
speakers include:
- Fr. Christopher Phillips, Pastor,
Our Lady of the Atonement Catholic Church
in San Antonio, Texas. He is the founding
pastor of the first Anglican Use parish,
erected in 1983 under the terms of the
Pastoral Provision.
- Archbishop Thomas Collins, Archbishop
of Toronto, Delegate, Anglicanorum Coetibus
in Canada (as appointed by the Vatican’s
Congregation for the Doctrine of the
Faith).
- Father Aidan Nichols, O.P. has
the honorary status of Affiliated Lecturer
in the University of Cambridge. He has
also taught at the Pontifical University
of St Thomas, Rome; St Mary?s College,
Oscott; and Blackfriars Hall, Oxford.
He has published some thirty books,
and over seventy articles.
A number of our people from Ottawa have
already booked into the hotel, which looks
brand new and has nice facilities. It
is probably even cheaper if you are willing
to share a room. I also heard that the
retreat facility has rooms that can hold
200 people so there’s plenty more
room if you think you might want to come.
Another Festival Down Under
24
February 2011
The Festival introducing the Anglican
Ordinariate for Australia in Perth
is announced as described here.
This meeting, hosted by Archbishop Hepworth,
Bishop Elliott and Bishop Harry Entwistle,
will be held on Saturday 26th February
2011 at Holy Family Catholic Church, Como.
Archbishop Hepworth tells me that they
are expecting about 150 people. We should
keep them in our prayers, and Australian
readers in that part of their country
should go to the Festival if they can.
* * *
Bishop Entwistle has just written to
me to say that they are expecting very
hot and humid weather. I hope the Holy
Family Church complex has air conditioning!
I quote Bishop Entwistle: “The
Catholic Archbishop [of Perth] and his
auxiliary will be there for part of the
day and there are quite a few registrations
from Catholics, including some priests.
No doubt the Catholic Record
will run a report”.
Bishop David Moyer’s
address to Becoming One Kansas City
I was raised as what I would call
a “Broad Church Episcopalian.” In my childhood
parish in Somerville, New Jersey, the
Eucharist gradually moved from being a
once a month main service celebration
with “Solemn High Morning Prayer” (with
the elevation of the cash!) for the other
Sundays of the month to being the principal
Service. It was dignified and reverent,
and the beauty and power of the Prayer
Book’s language took deep root in me.
I first felt a call to the priesthood
at the age of fourteen through the holiness
of the Rector of our parish. I would arrive
in the sacristy on Sundays at about 7:15AM
to serve as his acolyte for the 8:00AM
Service of Holy Communion. (I arrive at
everything early, and am a bit of a punctuality
freak.)
Upon arriving in the sacristy, I
would always see the Rector kneeling at
the communion rail in silent prayer. I
had no idea how long he had been there
in prayer. He would rise from his knees
ten minutes before the Service; would
step into the sacristy in silence; put
on his vestments; lead a prayer of preparation,
and then to the Altar we went.
I was not in any way put off by his
silence and refusal to engage in pre-Service
conversation. I knew unconsciously that
what he was about and what we would be
corporately about was very serious, and
very holy. I wanted to be like him.
I embraced the Anglo-Catholic tradition
when in seminary through my attendance
at the Church of the Ascension, Chicago
– where I first experienced Benediction
of the Blessed Sacrament (which took a
mystical grip on me, especially in the
silent moments of Adoration), and also
through my two years of field education
work at a parish in the western suburbs
of Chicago under the tutelage of a fine
priest who had been raised Southern Baptist
in Texas, and who described his “conversion”
to Anglo-Catholicism as “swallowing the
hook, line, and sinker – Mass, Mary, and
Confession!”
I’ll fast forward this to about ten
years ago when in my third rectorship
after 10 years as Rector of Good Shepherd,
Rosemont, I was elected President of Forward
in Faith North America. Forward in Faith
internationally had entered into a “Communion
Relationship” with the Traditional Anglican
Communion. I came to know the TAC and
Archbishop John Hepworth through meetings
and conferences of FIFNA and FIFUK, and
learned that the raison d’etre for the
TAC was Eucharistic unity with the Holy
See. I found myself being drawn to their
purpose and mission.
As Archbishop Hepworth stated in
his recent Pastoral Letter addressing
disunity in the Anglican Church in America
amongst its bishops, “Christian unity
is not an option for the Church. It is
the will of Jesus Christ made clear in
the Gospels;” “For Anglicans, the healing
of the separation from Catholic communion
at the Reformation must be the first act
of Christian unity;” “To be truly ‘catholic’
demands that one is in Eucharistic Communion
with the Church led by the successor of
Peter;” “From the most ancient times,
that has been the understanding of ‘all
the churches.’ The tragedy of Continuing
Anglicanism – and indeed of the Anglican
Communion – is the absence of Eucharistic
Communion with anyone but itself;” and
“It was to carry the dreams unleashed
by the first ARCIC conversations that
the TAC was formed.”
The Torres Strait
TAC Bishop Nona on the Apostolic Constitution
The Bishop of the Traditional Anglican
Communion (TAC) Torres Strait Diocese,
Church of the Torres Strait, The Right
Reverend Tolowa Nona, has described Pope
Benedict’s offer to Anglicans of full
communion with the Catholic Church as
“very generous”.
“It is perhaps the most-important
development in the Christian history of
the Torres Strait since the Coming of
the Light,” Bishop Nona said.
For years, traditional Anglicans
around the world have been asking the
Holy See to consider whether they may
be able to enter the Catholic Church,
while retaining their liturgical forms
and disciplines.
And it seems this may soon come to
pass in the Torres Strait.
Bishop Nona recently wrote to his
diocese describing the Pope Benedict XVI’s
offer as a “wonderful provision”.
However he told the Torres News the
Church of the Torres Strait had yet to
make a decision on whether to enter into
Communion with the Holy See.
“Every individual must first be consulted
before any decision can be made,” Bishop
Nona said.
“The Church of the Torres Strait
will remain – retaining its autonomy,
and continuing to preserve the Anglican
heritage.
“I am very confident that the Vatican
will respect that.”
“The kind of unity we sought with
the Holy See was an ‘organic unity’, which
means united but not absorbed.”
He said the delegate of the Pope,
Bishop Peter Elliot, would be invited
to the the Torres Strait along with his
party at the Diocesan Conference on June
3-5 this year.
Bishop Elliott’s Address
Bishop Peter J. Elliott, Auxiliary Bishop
of Melbourne, and the Pastoral Delegate
for the implementation of Anglicanorum
Coetibus in Australia wrote to the
Anglo-Catholic blog, “Unity
in Faith: Receiving Gifts and Bringing
Gifts to the Ordinariate,” which
he delivered at the Ordinariate Festival
held in Como, Perth, Western Australia,
this weekend.
Bishop Harry Entwistle of the Traditional
Anglican Communion hosted the event. The
TAC Primate, Archbishop John Hepworth,
also gave an inspiring address. The Catholic
Archbishop of Perth, Most Reverend Barry
Hickey, gave the welcoming address; his
Auxiliary Bishop, Most Reverend Donald
Sproxton, was also present.
According to Bishop Elliott, the event
was a tremendous success, with over one
hundred persons present. Before lunch,
a solemn Anglican Eucharist was celebrated
in the host Church of the Holy Family.
* * *
Ordinariate
Festival, Holy Family Parish, Como,
Perth, Western Australia,
February 26, 2011
UNITY
IN FAITH
Receiving
Gifts and Bringing Gifts to the Ordinariate
Bishop
Peter J. Elliott
Auxiliary Bishop, Melbourne
Anglicans on the way to full communion
in an ordinariate are already discovering
that they are part of a surprising adventure
of faith. I refer not only to the step
of personal commitment, but to a wider
and deeper corporate experience of unity
in the Faith that comes to us from the
Apostles. This Faith of the Church is
secured by being “in communion” with the
Successor of St Peter.
What some nervous Anglo Catholic may
imagine as coming under tighter control,
with a narrower vision, is in reality
quite the opposite. Catholic unity in
faith is a broadening experience – entering
a wider domain with endless vistas, yet
knowing all the while that here there
is always a secure parameter which Chesterton
once compared to a garden wall giving
children the security to play and be happy.
While that is true, I would prefer to
emphasize the authoritative point of reference
at the centre of the Faith of millions.
This point of reference was identified
and celebrated in a magnificent gesture
of commitment, when the bishops of the
Traditional Anglican Communion signed
the Catechism of the Catholic Church
in Fr Dolling’s historic church at Portsmouth
in October 2007. Their action was prophetic,
anticipating what would appear two years
later in Pope Benedict’s apostolic constitution
Anglicanorum Coetibus, where
we read “The Catechism of the Catholic
Church is the authoritative expression
of the Catholic faith professed by members
of the Ordinariate.” (1 § 5).
Published with the authority of the Venerable
Pope John Paul II in 1994, the Catechism
of the Catholic Church is a rich
summary of the Catholic Faith, derived
from the sources of Divine Revelation,
the Scriptures and Tradition. It is built
around the Christian essentials that we
all share in the creeds: Apostolic, Nicene
and Athanasian.
However, the Catechism not only
proposes what we believe but how we are
to live our covenant union with God and
one another, our graced life “in Christ”.
The Catechism moves in four stages:
1. the Profession of Faith (the creed),
2. the Celebration of the Christian Mystery
(liturgy and sacraments), 3. Life in Christ
(commandments, beatitudes and virtues),
4. Christian Prayer (built around the
Lord’s Prayer).
The Catechism embodies the solemn
teachings of the Popes and the Ecumenical
Councils In it we also find the treasury
of the Faith: the Fathers of the Church,
East and West, the men and women recognised
as Doctors of the Church, and the insights
of theologians, mystics and saints who
have universal appeal, such as Blessed
John Henry Newman.
The Catechism is now the focus
of study, reflection and prayer for all
people, laity and clergy, who are preparing
to enter full communion in an ordinariate.
Courses of study are under way in all
countries where the ordinariates are taking
shape this year.
The Anglican Impetus towards
Catholic Faith
Members of the ordinariates accept the
Catechism as their rule of faith
while maintaining their Anglican patrimony.
The heritage they bring resonates with
the Catechism because they cherish
an emphasis on Catholic essentials that
spread in Nineteenth Century Anglicanism
under the influence of the Oxford Movement.
We find some of these Catholic essentials
set out in the Chicago-Lambeth Quadrilateral
(1886, 1888). The ordinariates will continue
to honour the intentions and hopes of
those who framed this declaration, that
is, a desire for Christian unity. But
the Quadrilateral is clear that
unity must be grounded in orthodoxy, through
the Scriptures, the creeds, sacraments
and episcopacy, maintaining the living
apostolic tradition.
In more recent times the Affirmation
of St Louis (1977) speaks not only
to Anglicans but to Catholics. It remains
a timely reminder of “our apostolic descent”
and what can disrupt and undermine that
living tradition.
The ARCIC conversations and the fruit
of these conversations in the documents
will also be honoured in the ordinariates.
Recently it has been announced that the
ARCIC process will continue. Anyone tempted
to add “in spite of the papal offer of
the ordinariate”, should reflect whether
in fact it is the papal offer that has
kick-started ARCIC once more. With reference
to these ongoing conversations, I would
argue, as I have said elsewhere, that,
far from damaging ecumenism. the ordinariates
will provide a lively stimulus for better
relations between Anglicans and Catholics.
In this regard let us pray that the forthcoming
ARCIC discussions on the Church as communion
and Christian ethics will go well.
The Development of Christian
doctrine,
Reflecting on the apostolic faith, we
speak of a fixed “deposit of Faith” or
the ”faith once given to the Church” in
the Scriptures and tradition. Yet across
the centuries the Catholic Faith has demonstrated
an organic quality. The Faith always based
on the deposit, yet it is capable of growth.
This may be seen in the Catechism
itself which is the fruit of the development
of Christian doctrine.
Through the complex struggles over the
Person of Christ and the Holy Trinity,
in the fourth century various Fathers
of the Church understood how the deposit
of faith was being adapted and how the
Faith was developing as the Church grew
and spread across the world. Their insights
were taken up and spelt out more clearly
by Blessed John Henry Newman in his masterly
essay The Development of Christian
Doctrine. In that work, so crucial
in his personal journey, Newman carefully
set out the ways one can discern a true
gradual development as distinct from innovations
and errors.
Development reminds us that we cannot
stay fixated in some ideal age of the
past, for example arguing that “the Catholic
Faith” can only be defined within the
sphere of some Councils in certain centuries,
or that the Faith was somehow lost and
then had to be rediscovered and rewritten
many centuries later.
The Magisterium
The Catholic Faith has a living voice
in the Church. This gift of the apostolic
teaching office, the Magisterium, can
never be underestimated. In its papal
form, the Magisterium is one way through
which Peter’s successor fulfils the promise
of Jesus Christ and strengthens his brothers
and sisters in faith. The Catechism
itself is one means he uses as he exercises
this Petrine ministry, together with the
bishops of the whole apostolic college.
Through St Peter, God has assured the
Popes that they will not fail. This does
not refer to morality, for there have
been unworthy Popes in the past. It refers
to teaching Christ’s truths, The nature
of infallibility can best be understood
in terms of the word itself. “Infallible”
does not mean never being wrong, rather
not falling into error, not failing to
“strengthen the brethren”, at crucial
moments in the history of the Church.
At these times the teaching office must
be exercised. The Pope relies not on flesh
and blood, human guidance, to reveal truth,
but on our Father in heaven (Cf. Matthew
16:18-19). This is the Extraordinary Magisterium.
The Holy Spirit is at work in the Church,
the Spirit of truth leading us into all
truth. This same charism of infallibility
is evident when the whole college of bishops
with the Pope teaches solemnly at an Ecumenical
Council. The charism of infallibility
is also at work when the bishops faithfully
pass on the teachings of the Church on
faith and morals in their day to day ministry.
This is the Ordinary Magisterium, such
as we find in official catechisms.
As Anglo Catholics know, the dogmas proposed
by the Magisterium are liberating truths.
I believe that they will come to understand
this sense of life and freedom more clearly
once they enter full communion within
the Church. Here we are all securely guided
by the living voice of the Magisterium.
Our Heritage of Heroes
As the historic events leading to the
ordinariates unfold, we have around us
the prayerful company of the heroes of
faith, men and women great in Christian
mind and heart. This is where the patrimonies,
Anglican and Catholic, merge, a sharing
of heritage that is one of the most delightful
fruits of unity in Faith. I find that
the names of our heroes and heroines are
helpful.
The pre-Reformation heritage includes
the Venerable Bede, St Columba, St Cuthbert,
St Ninian, Duns Scotus, the much loved
Dame Julian of Norwich, and, in a wider
Europe, the minds of St Albert the Great
and St Thomas Aquinas. In the Reformation
era, we celebrate St John Fisher, St Thomas
More., St Teresa of Avila, St Robert Bellarmine,
then in more recent centuries, Rosmini
and Scheeben, St Therese of Lisieux, Henri
de Lubac, Hans Urs Von Balthasar, St Edith
Stein, John Paul II, and our Pope, Benedict
XVI.
The Anglican intellectual and spiritual
patrimony runs parallel to this stream.
The names are familiar: Richard Hooker,
Lancelot Andrews, Joseph Butler, John
and Charles Wesley, John Keble, Bl. John
Henry Newman, Edward Bouverie Pusey, Charles
Gore, William Temple, Evelyn Underhill,
Dorothy Sayers, Charles Williams, Dom
Gregory Dix, Michael Ramsey, John Macquarrie,
Kenneth Kirk, C.S. Lewis, Austin Farrer,
Eric Mascall – and after such a list I
ask pardon for leaving out other great
souls,
We know that these Christian men and
women took different paths and often disagreed
with one another, influenced by contrasting
loyalties, philosophies and cultures.
At times even the most brilliant had a
limited grasp of what Catholic unity means
(Gore), or they were constrained by historical
and political conditions (Hooker). Likewise
among the Catholics, Bellamine’s Counter
Reformation vision of the Church as the
“perfect society” was corrected and deepened
through the scriptural and patristic work
of Mathias Scheeben and Pius XII, which
then bore fruit in Vatican II.
However, we dare not make an idol of
any theologian. I am deeply influenced
by St Thomas Aquinas, but I am not a “Thomist”.
As the ‘Sixties recede from my memory
I have less sympathy for Karl Rahner (the
last of the scholastics?). Today I would
prefer his fellow Jesuit, Henri de Lubac
or the former Jesuit, Hans Urs Von Balthasar,
men who were named cardinals because they
loved the Church. I am also an admirer
of a leading English theologian, the Dominican,
Aidan Nichols, a friend of the Ordinariates
and former Anglican.
We need to recall that the struggle of
the theologian to elucidate the tradition
is not always easy. Most of the people
I name have at some time or other been
denounced and criticised by others. Their
own speculations may even have led them
into all sorts of problems. Therefore
the Magisterium can never be a circle
of theologians, as Hans Kung proposed
forty years ago. That opinion was recently
revived by some German-speaking theologians.
However, theologians do have a major influence
on how the Magisterium proposes truths
and how the understanding of doctrine
develops.
Breathing with Two Lungs
We dare not limit our understanding of
the Faith to the West, because the Church
“breathes with two lungs”, the East and
the West, as John Paul II insisted. When
Anglo Catholics come into full communion
they bring with them a well-developed
appreciation of the Christian East. This
grew through strong ecumenical links with
Eastern Orthodoxy, unfortunately weakened
in recent years for reasons well known
to us all.
The Christian East is evident In the
Catechism. It is a useful exercise
to go to the back of the Catechism and
check the references that are listed under
two headings “Liturgy” and “Ecclesiastic
Writers”. I believe the Eastern Christian
presence in the Catechism is
part of a theological and pastoral trend.
There is much interest today in the wisdom
of St Maximus the Confessor, the poetic
depth and rich Mariology of St Ephrem
the Syrian, the doctrine and spirituality
of St John Chrysostom, St Basil and St
Gregory Nazianzen. At the same time we
are seeing a revival of interest in the
greatest Western Father, St Augustine,
so dear to the heart and mind of our Pope.
Through communion with Rome, members
of the ordinariates will be in communion
with the venerable Eastern Catholic Churches.
They will have access to the liturgical
and sacramental life of these ancient
communities. Therefore the wisdom and
piety of Eastern Christianity will no
longer be something to be seen and admired
from the outside, rather something to
appropriate from within the living Church.
Unity and Continuity in Faith
Another dimension of unity in Catholic
faith that will be enriched by the arrival
of Anglicans is a sense of continuity
in faith. This is an obvious example
of how Anglicans coming into unity of
faith bear gifts, and do not come empty
handed.
Anglo Catholics have a keen sense of
continuity in faith, knowing
that “the Faith once given” has to be
passed on with integrity and care across
the generations of humanity. Entering
the ordinariates they will readily understand
the insistent call of Pope Benedict to
interpret the Second Vatican Council in
continuity with the whole living tradition
of our faith that preceded the Council.
It was not a rupture with the past, not
some revolutionary new beginning.
What is now called the “hermeneutic of
continuity”, was first articulated by
Pope Paul VI in June 1972 in a challenging
address to the cardinals. Ten years since
the Council began he could see how misinterpretations
wrench the Council out of its context,
which is the centuries-old living tradition
of the Church in matters of faith and
morals.
Nonetheless the Council represents a
development of doctrine, firstly in terms
of an enriched understanding of the Church
herself and of her mission in this world,
which Pope John Paul II took up and proclaimed
as a New Evangelization. We need only
reflect on the universal call to holiness,
the dignity of the human person, the advances
in teaching about marriage, the vindication
of ecumenism and religious liberty. In
these themes all found in the Catechism,
we recognise how the Council took up and
developed aspects of the Faith so pertinent
to our times.
Valuing the faith
However the contribution that Anglicans
bring to the ordinariates is not only
this sense of continuity but also a sense
of valuing the Faith. There are
times in life when we only value something
because we have struggled and suffered
for it, or because someone has tried to
take it from us.
Many traditional Anglicans have had to
fight for the Faith, making personal sacrifices.
I refer not only to the stand taken over
the past thirty years as divisive innovations
steadily took hold. I recall and honour
the historic stand so many men and women
have taken to rediscover and affirm a
Catholic identity inspired by the Oxford
Movement in its successive phases. My
own father, Rev. Leslie Llewelyn Elliott,
was an example to me of valuing the Faith.
However the times have changed and events
have taken a new confronting turn. These
realities seem to be lost on some Anglo-Catholics
who are tempted to make a desperate “last
stand” by just staying where they are.
Permit me to suggest that it is a waste
of time and spiritual energy to cling
to such a dangerous illusion. Valuing
the Catholic Faith should not be confused
with polemics. Let me quietly invite you
to lay down weapons of controversies that
are now pointless, to set aside endless
intrigues which led nowhere, to walk away
from futile conflicts which cannot build
up the Body of Christ in charity. Accept
the invitation of the Vicar of Christ
on earth.
The gentle man who reaches out to you
in Anglicanorum coetbus has no
ulterior motives. His apostolic offer
is clear. There is no deception here.
He calls you to peace.
Evangelical Catholicism
Let me end this reflection on unity in
the Faith with an appeal to maintain an
evangelical vision of our Faith.
In recent years there has been talk of
an emerging “evangelical Catholicism”.
Some commentators have found this vibrant
phenomenon among the vast gatherings of
World Youth Day, such as we saw in 2009
in Sydney and as we will see in Madrid
this year.
Crowds of young people praising God and
loving the Church in the streets of great
cities remind us that the Catholic Faith
is to be proclaimed, taught and learnt,
shared and celebrated. Our mission from
Jesus Christ is to “go out to the whole
world”. We do not only “keep the faith”.
We give the faith. We evangelise.
Once the ordinariates are established
and settle down, I pray that they will
be communities open to people, open to
the future, centres for the New Evangelisation.
I pray that through the beauty of worship
and fine preaching, the ordinariates will
inspire people with a loving and prayerful
enthusiasm, to give themselves to Jesus
Christ, our only Lord and Saviour. He
speaks to us in his Word and nourishes
us in the Eucharist and sacraments. He
alone is the answer, as Pope Benedict
always reminds us. He is the answer to
cynical post-modern nihilism, the answer
to the culture of death, the answer to
the threats of secularist totalitarianism
and sectarian extremism. He is the centre
of the Faith of the Church.
Each person entering the Ordinariate
in a group that seeks unity, will profess
this One Faith with the words of the creed,
then adding these words: “I believe and
profess all that the holy Catholic Church
believes, teaches and proclaims to be
revealed by God.” By God’s grace may we
all live what we profess and generously
share what we believe.